Film Analysis: The 39 Steps (1935)

The mise-en-scene of The 39 Steps serves to lay out the skeleton of the film if everything else were removed. Important places, moments of suspense, hints at romance, and the “ah-ha” moment are all present in the following four observations. While others, such as the use of shadows signifying imminent action, are also obvious, these are the ones that seemed to stick out the most.

In the opening sequence, the music hall sign is lit up one letter at a time and slowly. It calls for the attention of the viewer. Being the first thing seen and taking a while to get to the actual hall, it is obvious that the hall will be an important place. The film begins with a large gathering and the performance of a man with an impressive memory. A gunshot causes a riot, and protagonist Hannay leaves with a woman who will throw him into the story. At the closing of the film, they are once again seated in a music hall listening to Mr. Memory. Hannay, having been chased throughout the movie by spies and police, calls out “What are the 39 Steps?” When Mr. Memory begins to answer, another gunshot is heard. People panic, and police swarm the stage after the gunman. Both times the characters enter music halls, chaos follows.

The ringing of the telephone in the first part of the film signals the building of tension, like a warning bell.  The ringing of a telephone pulls most people to answer the phone; the continued ringing grates on the nerves and causes the buildup of tension and suspense. Then, when it has stopped, the question of what it was about is left over. There is a feeling of anxiety, a worry over something not known. In the scene in Hannay’s apartment, someone calls twice. The first is shortly after he and Annabella Smith arrive. She begs him not to answer it, and he obliges. He humors her when she claims that there are spies after her, but the phone call has made him uneasy. It rings again after she died from the knife wound in her back just a few hours later. Another warning bell. Remembering Smith’s fears and noticing two men outside beside a phone booth, he believies her. The ringing of the telephone accentuated the feeling that something was wrong, and because it went unanswered there was a feeling of Hannay missing something and in danger. If the people who killed the woman are calling him, they obviously know what she would have told him.

Later, Hannay is bound to a woman, Pamela, by handcuffs. Spies masquerading as police cuffed them together after apprehending Hannay after a political ralley. Pamela believes Hannay is a murderer, and constatantly attempts to get away from him. The handcuffs in the inn scene show the rising sexual tension between the two. They are already bound together and must learn to move around each other while chained, as though figuratively married.  When Pamela goes to remove her stockings, Hannay’s hand is there next to her legs.  Because they are handcuffed together, she must also sleep in the same bed next to him. The longer they are cuffed together, the more the sexual tension between them is insinuated. When Pamela finally is able to slip her hand out of the cuffs, there is an awkwardness between them for a little while. Once Hannay realizes she now trusts him and wants to help him, he goes back to being more familiar. At the very end, after the excitement at the hall, the film closes with the two holding hands again.  They had to hold hands for a good third of the movie while handcuffed and now are doing so voluntarily. The tension between them is shown to still exist, even though they are no longer chained to each other.

A recurring tune is present throughout the film with Hannay’s whistling. He does it every so often when the pressure is starting to get to him. He does it often while handcuffed to Pamela. The tune is Mr. Memory’s theme and was present at the very beginning when in the music hall. Hannay only remembers where it came from at the very end when the theme starts up again before Mr. Memory comes on stage. It was at that point that Hanney starts to put all of the pieces together. The theme was a clue throughout the film, if noticed, that Memory was important to the plot. It turned out that he was the answer to the whole puzzle.

The 39 Steps (1935)

The 39 Steps was directed by Alfred Hitchcock and follows Hannay, a Canadian in London who attempts to help a woman pursued by spies at a music hall exhibition, as he attempts to evade police and the spies who killed a woman in his apartment. After the girl’s body was found, authorities assumed that he was the murderer. He travels to Scotland and back, half of that time handcuffed to Pamela, a woman who believes he is the murderer. Eventually, she believes him after overhearing the spies on the telephone while they are pretending to be runaway newlyweds. They make their way to another theater where the police find them, but Hannay exposes the spy ring with a question to Mr. Memory, the man who was at the music hall exhibition and who knows an insane amount of random facts. When Memory begins to answer the question, “What are the 39 Steps?”, he is shot by the ringleader of the spies. The gunman is arrested, and the film ends with Hannay and Pamela holding hands.

I watched this in just the last few days on the internet archives (there are a ton of movies there under Creative Commons) because it was the one on the list that I could get free. I don’t care for Hitchcock films; they rarely make sense to me, and this one was no exception. I got what it was about, but it seemed like it was only half a story. It was interesting, but it felt like pieces were missing. Hitchcock films aren’t big on using logic, and this one falls right in line with that. Why not kill Hannay while in the apartment killing the girl at the beginning? They decide to go outside and call him instead. I did like the story, it’s just that it is hard to watch because so much of it is dark due to the grayscale. The actors were not over-acting, which is good because those are generally irritating. Overall, for a Hitchcock, I was okay with it. It’s a good film and very much recommended if you like Hitchcock, but be prepared to be left feeling like the villains don’t really want to get anything done.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0026029/

The Croods (2013)

Directors  Kirk De Micco and Chris Sanders bring Dreamworks’s brightly colored prehistoric film to the present. The last surviving local family, the Croods, fights for food and hides in their cave until the world changes too much for them to remain stuck in the Stone Age. Their safe cave is destroyed by the shifting Earth, and they must rely on Guy, a forward-thinker with “ideas” and fire. To survive the end of their world, they must evolve and always keep moving forward. They are able to find a new world in which they can continue to develop and learn.

This has got to be the brightest colored movie since Finding Nemo. I got to see it in 3D in theaters a couple of weeks after it opened, and it was a total explosion of color. It’s almost too much at times, but the effect the color has is to solidify the distinction between the old and the new, between the cave and the open world. Anything that has a dull color is a part of the dying world they are trying to escape. The bright colors show the future they could have if they allow themselves to survive. That theme and the continuous humor made it worth watching several times over. I didn’t care much for the shape of the characters, but they fit with their surroundings. It really doesn’t matter as most animated characters are too angular or too rounded anyway. It just looks odd to me. Everyone should watch The Croods; rarely does a film come along that demands constant laughing and is appropriate for all ages. This one is definitely both.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0481499/?ref_=hm_cht_t3

http://www.thecroodsmovie.com/

Reign of Fire (2002)

Director Rob Bowman groups Christian Bale, Matthew McConaughey, and Gerard Butler together for a new take on the apocalypse. Bale plays Quinn, the leader of a small band of survivors in England, who saw them before the rest of the world. Drilling and tunneling in London woke the creatures, and by the time the world realized what they were, it was too late. The world burned, and the dragons took their place at the top of the food chain. When a small army of Americans turns up, Quinn’s world goes upside down. He comes to realize the only way to ensure the survival of the human species is to take out the one male dragon. Quinn and two of the Americans journey to London in the hopes of planting an explosive in the throat of the male. The dragons were already eating their own; without the male the species would die out on its own.

I found this on television a year or so ago and loved it. It’s my favorite Christian Bale film, even though I can’t stand McConaughey in the slightest. It’s difficult to decide on a favorite between this and the Harry Potter series, which is odd because they have almost nothing in common. And the Potterverse can’t be split up, so Reign of Fire just kind of gets tucked in behind it on the list. The idea of dragons taking over the world, and actually making it work on the screen, is interesting. The whole storyline attracted me to it; it’s not magical, but it is fantastical. Some of the actors (McConaughey in particular) irritate me; they don’t seem to fit into the character. Also, a fair bit of the special effects aren’t completely blended and show up around a lot of edges. The same happens with some of the makeup & prosthetics. Other than that, it’s great, and more people should see it. I actually don’t know anyone who has seen it, so that’s something to take care of.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0253556/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

Following the Lord of the Rings trilogy comes Peter Jacksons newest conquest of the Tolkien universe. The Hobbit takes place before Bilbo left the One Ring to Frodo and is played back as one large flashback started and ended with a much older Bilbo recording his travels in the leather book that will one day be Frodo’s. Gandalf, the wizard, involves Bilbo Baggins with a band of Dwarves dead set to oust the Dragon, Smaug, from their home in the Lonely Mountain and recover their long lost gold. On their journey they encounter Trolls, Goblins, Elves, and Orcs led by a pale and scarred Orc/Goblin (Azog the Defiler, Goblin King of Moria). Thorin and Azog have a personal battle to wage over Moria and Thorin’s family during the new trilogy. While traveling through the Misty Mountain, the Dwarves are captured by Goblins, but Bilbo is separated from them. He finds his way to an underground lake where the creature Gollum lives. Before noticing Bilbo, Gollum accidentally drops something, and Bilbo picks it up, sees that it is a ring, and hides it in his pocket. After a game of riddles during which Gollum is planning the best way to eat the Hobbit, Bilbo slips it on and vanishes. This is the first glimpse of the One Ring. The Pale Orc catches up to the group a little ways out of the mountains when the group has been reunited, and Bilbo proves that there is much more to him than Thorin believes. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug will pick up just after this revelation and bring more tests for Bilbo and the Dwarves.

I got to see this twice in the theater and about ten times since it hit DVDs on March 19th. If you’ve seen Lord of the Rings, you have to see The Hobbit. No two ways about it; everyone should watch it. It’s not a bad adaptation of Tolkien, either. Some people argue that the only reason for turning it into another trilogy is to make more money. Actually, if they plan on even telling the story any more in depth than the old animated version did, there has to be at least two films on it. It’s not possible to fit that much into such a tiny space. Now they can explore all of the little pieces of foreshadowing in The Hobbit that actually help a little with understanding LOTR, which is why I’m now very much diving into the Tolkien universe. As far as the design and everything goes, it works the same as LOTR. There’s not really anything I don’t like about this, other than that they made it into a flashback, rather than a straight story. But the use of the flashback makes it easier to find the stopping points for the movies, and it works well, so the only problem I have with it is just that it irks me. Whenever the flashback stops for a bit, it kind of keeps you from getting lost in the magic.

http://www.thehobbit.com/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0903624/?ref_=sr_1

VUDU streaming and stored movies

http://vudu.extole.com/a/clk/2GVMRk

Tried it with The Hobbit and got some extras that weren’t on the blu-ray copy. Much more convenient than the old digital downloads. And you get 10 free pre-picked movies when you sign up. Mine included Ghost, Paranormal Activity, Rudy, Psycho, and Valentine’s Day. I think it’s worth signing up just because you get free movies after your first code redemption, rental, or purchase. And if you share with friends, you get a credit.

Clue (1985)

From director Jonathan Lynn comes a film based on the classic board game and set during the height of the Communism scare. Six strangers meet at an old mansion belonging to a Mr. Boddy. Mrs. Peacock, Colonel Mustard, Ms. Scarlet, Mr. Green, Mrs. White, and Professor Plum all have something problematic in common, and Mr. Boddy is the cause of it. Invited to the mansion by Wadsworth, Mr. Boddy’s butler, they are all getting to know each other when Mr. Boddy is killed. The killer is one of them, but no one knows who it is. Terrified of each other, yet too frightened to be alone, they set off to solve the mystery. The cook, the maid, a policeman, a stranded motorist, and a telegram singer follow Mr. Boddy, but still no one knows who did it. Wadsworth is the first to understand and the next thirty minutes consist of three completely different possible endings. All of the guests had government ties, and it was originally believed that these ties were the reasons behind their mutual problem. The truth, however, was that each of them had displayed “thoroughly un-American” characteristics. Yet the recurring line in each of the possible endings was “Communism was just a red herring.” In the end, it became known that the person who killed Mr. Boddy was Mr. Green in the Hall with the Revolver.

I first found this movie a couple of months ago on television. I watched it because I had always loved the board game Clue, and Tim Curry can make anything funny. It completely mocks the Joseph McCarthy era. All of the little jibes pointed towards the FBI and House Un-American Activities Committee are just slightly above being subtle. I love the political jokes, the casting, and the way everything transitions a little haphazardly. It adds to the chaos. Even though the cast and script together are what makes it funny, I don’t like that it is so ridiculous in parts. Sometimes you just want to hide; a scene will be so awkward feeling that you sit through it cringing. They’re just a little too cliché. It needed a little smoothing over. Other than that, it’s a great movie. It’s funny and political and definitely recommended.

http://www.jonathanlynn.com/films/clue/clue.htm

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088930/?ref_=sr_2

OZ: The Great and Powerful

Directed by Sam Raimi, the 2013 prequel to The Wizard of OZ (1939) is an interesting adaptation. It shows much less of politics than Dorothy’s story. In Oz The Great and Powerful, small-time magician/con man Oscar Diggs gets himself into trouble with his illusions and manages to run straight into a tornado bound for the Land of Oz. Once there, he is greeted by a witch named Theodora, who believes him to be the prophesied salvation. Her sister, Evanora, has convinced Theodora that the good witch, Glinda is the evil witch. In reality, Evanora has been the evil one all along. She sends Oz off on a mission meant to destroy Glinda and all opposition. It backfires, and he joins Glinda’s resistance when he finds out who the real wicked witch is. Unfortunately, Theodora had lulled herself into thinking that Oz cared greatly for her. When she sees him with Glinda, she begs Evanora to take the pain away. With the bite of an apple, the Wicked Witch of the West is created. It is up to Oz to rally the people and take back the Emerald City as the great and powerful Wizard of Oz.

A friend of mine loves the Oz stories, so we went to see it the day after it came out at the Morrilton cinema. Because the styles between the original and Oz are so different, they are very interesting to compare. The choice in actors is spot on. Even James Franco’s exaggerated voice fits his character perfectly. The settings are very well done; they seem to be a real place while also giving the impression of other-worldliness. The worst thing about it, though, is the quality of the special effects. The edges on the people are too sharp. The fact that the edges are visible can be damaging to the company. The effects need to be blended more evenly. This film is appropriate for all ages, although it seems to have been directed more towards children. In any case, it’s definitely an interesting film to watch.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1623205/?ref_=sr_1

disney.go.com/thewizard/

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is director Ang Lee’s 2000 story of mystic Chinese warriors fighting for love and a special sword. In it, Wudan Master, Li Mu Bai, gives up his life as a warrior for the love of Yu Shu Lien. He sends his jade sword away to another protector, but it is stolen by a young warrior trained in Wudan. The warrior turns out to be a governor’s daughter who is in love with one man while set to marry another. She causes much trouble in her efforts to avoid the arranged marriage. Meanwhile, Mu Bai is after her master, Jade Fox, who killed his master with poison when she stole a Wudan scroll after being denied entrance into Wudan. By following and finding the girl, Mu Bai is eventually able to kill Jade Fox. Then, he dies, too, because a poisoned quill materialized in his neck. The movie ends with the girl jumping off of Wudan Mountain and leaving her lover behind. That’s what happens; I have no idea what the movie is actually about. The main villain has very little screen time, and it seems like one big teenager temper tantrum.

I watched the movie over the weekend. It was the one I had access to that could be used for two assignments. It was the first time I had ever seen it, and it was most likely also the last. I liked the acting, the idea, the scenery, and the small effects. I hated the execution of it. It felt incomplete, like it was only a segment in the dead center of another story. Pieces of it weren’t even explained. Yes, we were told why Mu Bai wanted to kill Jade Fox, but she wasn’t even an important part of the film. The segment at the end where she pops up just long enough to die and stab Mu Bai with a poisoned quill felt like it was added as an afterthought, like somebody remembered at the last minute that there was a villain mentioned in the early scenes that hadn’t been dealt with. It felt completely random and backwards. The idea of it was really interesting, but overall it was a flop. It wasn’t a boring movie; it had plenty of action. The problem was that none of it actually made much sense. Unless someone just really has a hankering for something with a lack of reason, I don’t recommend watching it. All of the camera work and acting was neat, but there are better movies to spend two hours watching.

Official Website N/A

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0190332/?ref_=sr_1